The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal
The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal
Blog Article
refers to a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and implement Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It is vital for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to prevent potential offenders and make sure justice for that victims and their people.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC gives for that death penalty because the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender might be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
Note: Please fill any field and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave area blank.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as police officials did not inform him that the identification parade on the accused hasn't been conducted nonetheless. In the instant case, now the accused tried to consider advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image of the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity on the accused through electronic media. The legislation lends assurance towards the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed photographs. In addition to, the images shown to the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to cover his identity until eventually he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos in the accused publically, either by showing the same for the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or software, would create doubt inside the proceedings of the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there is no possibility for your witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the push or electronic media. Offered the reasons elaborated earlier mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's properly-settled that though contemplating the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the merit of each of the eligible candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this kind of eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded because of the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part from the respondent department.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
P.C. Liability of petitioners for your mentioned offences would be determined because of the acquired trial Court after sifting the evidentiary truly worth of your material produced before the same. Till then, case of
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and also case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
Criminal cases While in the common regulation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil regulation systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its probable to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, here a comprehensive grasp of such changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section forty four(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
It is also important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual size of service just about violates the entire service construction for a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention with the legislation nor with the equity. Read more